Errata for David Hartill’s Cast Chinese Coins

November 9, 2007

Errata for David Hartill’s Cast Chinese Coins

by Russ Weltmer

Hartill Catalogue No.	Other References, As Printed	Suggested Change to References (Notes 1, 2)	Rationalé for Change
SECTION 1
No entries
SECTION 2
2.6	FD52	--	FD52 obverse is Ba, not Qi
2.35	FD58	FD40	FD references for 2.35 & 2.39 are interchanged
2.39	FD40	FD58	FD references for 2.35 & 2.39 are interchanged
2.60	FD31	FD32	FD references for 2.60 & 2.61 are interchanged
2.61	FD32	FD31	FD references for 2.60 & 2.61 are interchanged
Pg. 12			Mid-page reference to Page 15 should be Page 13.
2.87	DCD123, FD23	DCD123	FD23 is not a match to 2.87
2.165	DCD135, FD101, S41	DCD135, FD101	S41 in not a match to 2.165
2.166	DCD184, FD97	DCD184, FD97, S41~	S41 is similar to 2.166
2.167	--	S41~	S41 is similar to 2.167
2.170	DCD179, FD23	DCD179	As with 2.87, FD23 is also a poor match to 2.170.
2.181	S43, FD11	--	S43 & FD11 smaller than 2.181
2.182	--	S43, FD11	S43 & FD11 size nearer to 2.181
SECTION 3
3.21	DCD222	DCD222, FD273	FD273 is also an exact match.
3.23	DCD221, FD273	DCD221, FD275	FD273 is smaller than 3.23, FD275 is exact match.
3.44	DCD215, FD305, S3	DCD215, FD304, S3	FD304 is an exact match, FD305 is not.
3.45	--	FD305	FD305 is an exact match.
3.46	DCD216	DCD216, S12A~	S12A is a near match.
3.47	DCD216, FD308	DCD216, FD306	Typo
3.115-7	DCD328. FD144-5	DCD328?, FD145-6	FD144 is 75mm. 3.115-7 & FD115-6 are ~ 50mm.
3.119-20	DCD328, FD146	DCD328?, FD144	FD146 is 50mm. 3.119-20 & FD144 are 75mm.
3.150			Rarity is omitted.
3.182-3	DCD250, FD16, S13-27	DCD250, FD160, S13-27	Typo on FD160
3.217	DCD247, FD188	DCD247, FD188	FD188 is an exact match for 3.217
3.218	DCD247, FD188	DCD247, FD189	FD189 is an exact match for 3.218
3.219	DCD247, FD189	DCD247, FD190	FD189 is not a match, FD190 is an exact match.
3.229			Numbers jump from 3.229 to 3.330 in the same type of Spade coins.
3.330
3.348			W. W. Shanxi should be W. Shanxi.
3.361-2	DCD242, FD168, S7-12	DCD242, S7-12	FD168 obverse legend is An Yang (similar to 3.187), not Ping Yang
3.375	--	FD232	FD232 is an exact match.
3.420-1	DCD272, FD164-5	DCD272, FD164, FD166	FD165 is a typo, already used as match to 3.419.
SECTION 4
4.5	DCD403, FD354	DCD403, FD352	FD354 is 5 character, used as a match for 4.2
4.6	DCD397, FD351-3, S45	DCD397, ~FD351, S46	FD352 is a 4 character match for 4.5. FD353 has a different legend. S46 is a closer match than S45.
4.7	DCD397, FD351-3, S45	DCD397, ~FD351, S46
SECTION 5
No entries
SECTION 6
6.6	DCD613, FD374	DCD613, FD374~	FD 374 is only somewhat similar to 6.6
6.9	DCD618, FD373	DCD618, FD373~	FD373 is not an exact match.
SECTION 7
7.17	FD422, S92-95	FD422	Schjöth’s images are poor representations of actual coins.
7.18	FD425, S96-99	FD425	Same comment as above.
SECTION 8
8.2	--	FD429	FD429 is also an exact match.
SECTION 9
9.1	FD447, S120	FD447~, S120~	FD447 has 2 dots in Wu. (Schjöth’s Da Guan Wu Zhu images are poor representations of actual coins.)
9.2	FD446, S127-8	S127	S127 is only exact match.
9.7	--	FD449	FD449 is only exact match.
9.9	FD450, S136	FD450, S137~	S137 is a better match than S136
9.10	FD450, S136	FD451, S136~	FD451 is an exact match, S136 is a close match.
9.12	FD458, S119	FD457, S119	FD458 is the cut-off head of an FD457 knife coin
9.37	S152, S160 &c	S160	S152 has an inner rim, 9.37, S160 does not.
9.43	S164	--	“Skinny” Huo of 9.43 is not a match for S162
9.45	FD492, S165	FD492	S165 is a half star, or “blob”, not a star
9.46	--	S165	S165 is an exact match for 9.46, not 9.45
SECTION 10
10.13	FD550, S227	FD550, S228~	S228 is a better match
10.16	FD566, S217	FD 566~, S217	FD566 has a very narrow outer rim. S217 has medium rims.
10.17	FD589, S225	FD590, S225	FD590 & S225 are exact matches. FD589 is not.
10.22	FD587?	FD598~	FD598 is a better match.
10.24	FD612	Hua267a	FD612 has no vertical bar left of Wu. 10.24 has a bar.
10.28	FD582, S306	FD581, S306	FD582 has an obverse on both sides of coin
10.31	FD514, S180	FD514, S180~	S180 is 20mm, others are <15mm.
SECTION 11
11.14	FD521, S187	FD521	11.14 & FD521 are 22mm. S187 is 27.5mm
11.22	FD545~	FD545	FD545 is an exact match. Rubbing on FD faint
11.35	FD538	FD538~	FD538 has narrow rims, 11.34 has med. rims
11.36	FD539	FD540	11.36 & FD540 are exact matches.
SECTION 12
12.5	FD553	FD553~	FD553 is not an exact match.
SECTION 13
13.14	FD576	FD578	FD576 is a typo.
13.20	FD600, S237	FD600	S237 is a match for FD601.
SECTION 14
Pg. 106			Image at top right hand of page 106 is not numbered.
14.14 pg.106	--		Error in numbering.
14.17	--		14.17 has reverse inverted from Hua and David Jen.
14.51	S404-5	FD740, S405	FD740 & S405 are exact matches.
14.63	FD721, S387	S386	14.63 & S386 are matches, FD721 is not.
14.64	--	FD721	FD721 is also exact match.
14.90	FD724, S391	S391	14.90 & S391 are exact match. FD724 is not.
14.101	FD691, S352	S352	14.101 & S352 are 28mm. FD691 is 24mm.
14.105	FD699, S355	FD693, S355	FD699 is 28mm. 14.105, FD693, & S355 are ~35mm
14.109	FD696, S358	S358	FD696 cloud has the wrong shape
14.115	S361	~S361	14.115 is 22.0mm; S361 is 25.6mm
14.132A			Ditto marks should be added below each word in 14.132 comments
SECTION 15
15.11	S411	S411a	S411 does not exist.
15.31	FD772	--	FD772 has a right hook Yuan.
15.35	--	FD772	FD772 is an exact match.
15.51	FD739	FD779	FD739 is a typo.
15.69	FD797	FD794	FD797 is a typo.
15.78	FD809, S439	FD809	S439 is 33.5mm; FD809 is 38-40mm.
15.95	FD819, S440	FD819	S440 in not a good match..
15.106	FD830	FD829	FD830 is a different coin. FD829 is an exact match.
15.107	FD824, S436	S436	FD824 is a different coin.
15.110	FD827	FD827~	FD827 is not an exact match.
15.112	FD828	FD828~	FD828 is not an exact match.
15.172	--	FD843	FD843 is also an exact match.
15.173	--	FD844	FD844 is also an exact match.
15.174	--	FD845	FD845 is also an exact match.
SECTION 16
16. 1	S451	S451~	S451 is not an exact match.
16.1a-d	FD859, S452	FD850, S452	Typo. FD859 is an iron coin with a plain reverse
16.4	FD853	FD853~	FD853 has a level crescent. 16.4 has a crescent tilted right.
16.30	FD870	FD870~	FD870 has thin rim.
16.32	FD869	FD869~	Yuan in FD869 has no ball.
16.43	FD876, S469	S469	FD876 is not a match.
16.44	--	FD876	FD876 is an exact match.
P.131			Introduction to Jing De and Xiang Fu 16.49-16.58 states that legends are regular orthodox script, however Yuan is not.
16.49	FD881, S471	FD881~, S471~	FD881 & S471 have narrow rims, 16.49 has medium width rims
16.52	FD883, S473-4	FD883, S473	Yuan in S484 is different.
16.58	FD890, S478	FD890, S478~	S478 has narrow outer rim.
16.71	FD894~	FD894	FD894 is an exact match.
16.75A	S487	--	There is no exact match.
16.75B	S487	S487	487 is an exact match.
16.87	FD902, S492	FD902~, S492~	FD902 & S492 have narrow rims. 16.76 has med rims.
16.89	FD901, S494	FD901~, S494~	FD901 & S494 have narrow rims. 16.76 has med rims.
16.98			Delete redundant of in text
16.101	S501	--	S501 had large characters, not small
16.111	FD905	--	FD905 is not a close match.
16.119	--	FD907	FD907 is an exact match.
16.124	S505	--	S505 has narrow rims.
16.135	FD919, S511	S511	FD919 has different style Yuan
16.136	FD919, S511	FD919	S511 has different style Yuan.
16.138	FD923, S512~	FD923~, S512~	FD923 & S512 both have narrow outer rim.
16.143	FD932	--	FD932 is 32mm, 16.143 is 36mm
16.150	S515	S515~	S515 is a near match.
16.158	S520~	FD938, S520~	FD938 is an exact match.
16.160	FD939, S523	FD939~	FD939 is not an exact match.
16.161	FD939, S523	S523	S523 is an exact match.
16.168	FD943	FD944	FD943 is not a match for 16.168. FD944 is an exact match.
16.170	S527	S527, FD946	FD946 is also an exact match.
16.173	FD945	FD945~	FD945 has long outer strokes on Ning & Bao. 16.173 has short strokes .
16.187	FD953	--	FD953 is 25.5mm, 16.187 is 23.5mm with narrower rims.
16.233	--	FD969	FD969 is also an exact match.
16.262	--	S568	16.262 & S568 are exact matches.
16.284	FD984, S576	FD984~, S576	FD984 has a flat-based Tong; 16.284 & S576 have a curved-base Tong.
16.290	FD990, S585	FD990, S582	S582 is 21.5mm, 16.290 & S582 are 24.5-25mm. S585 has a round bao, others have a square bao.
16.304	FD999, S597	FD999	S597 Bao is narrow, others are broad.
16.305	--	S597	Both have narrow Bao.
16.306	FD994	FD994~	FD994 is not an exact match for 16.307.
16.307	FD991, S586	S586	Only S586 is a match for 16.306. See 16.310 comments
16.310	--	FD991	FD991 has the distinctive Shao also.
16.344	FD1012	--	FD1012 is not a close match.
16.369	FD1025, S612	FD1025, S613	S612 is much smaller than 16.369.
16.377	FD1018, S609	--	Both FD1018 & S609 have claw feet. 16.377 doesn’t.
16.402	FD1041	--	FD1041 is not a match (very narrow rim, weak hook on Ning).
16.407	FD1050, S622	S622	16.407 & S622 have sharply curved hook on Ning & large characters. FD 1050 has gently curved hook & medium characters.
16.424	FD1061, S632	S632~	FD1061 is bronze, S632 is iron.
16.428	FD1070, S633	FD1072, S633	16.428, FD1072 & S633 have unique “cross-hairs” Bao. FD1070 does not.
16.435	FD1077, S638	--	16.435 has wide rims, 32.5mm. FD1077 & S638 don’t have wide rims or square Bao.
16.436	--	S638~	S638 is close match but slightly smaller.
16.437	--	FD1077, S639	FD1077 & S639 are exact matches.
16.438	FD1089, S643	FD1089	S643 has narrow rim & round Bao.
16.440	FD1087	S645	16.440 & S645 are 32-33mm. FD1087 is 29mm.
16.447	FD1086	--	FD1086 has cresc. tips out & is Regular script.
16.459	S642	--	S642 is 21mm, 16.459 is 25mm
16.461	--	FD1086	FD1086 is an exact match.
16.462	FD1088	--	FD1088 is Li script, already a reference for 16.454
16.468	FD1100-01, S652	FD1101	FD1101 & S652 have no hook on Yuan. 16.468 & FD1100 have a left hook.
Pg. 157			Small Xuan He tong bao coins with Xuan in regular script omitted (Hua603e-f).
16.475			Number following should be 16.476, not 16.576.
16.476	FD1111, S659	FD1111, S659~	S659 has narrow rims. 16.476 & FD1111 rims are broad.
16.486	S655	S655~	S655 has narrow rim. 16.486 has medium rim.
16.492	FD1113, S661~	FD1113~, S661~	FD1113 has narrower rims & smaller diameter
16.517	FD1129, S670	FD1131, S670	FD1129 is not a match, FD1131 is an exact match.
SECTION 17
17.3	FD1141	FD1141~	FD1141 is not an exact match.
17.9	FD1147, S674	FD1147~, S674	FD1147 is not an exact match.
17.10	FD1149, S675	FD1149, S675~	S675 is not an exact match.
17.28	--	FD1150	FD1150 is an exact match.
17.36	FD1160, S681	FD1160~, S681	FD1160 is not an exact match.
17.38	S683	S683~	S683 is not an exact match.
17.39	S684	S684~	S684 is not an exact match.
17.46	S686	S686~	S686 is not is an exact match.
17.47	S688	S688~	S688 is not an exact match.
17.56	S694	S694~	S694 is not an exact match.
17.60	S692	S692~	S692 is not an exact match.
17.61	S693	S693~	S693 is not an exact match.
17.65	FD1172, S698	FD1175, S698	FD1172 has a narrow Yuan. S698 & FD1175 have a wide Yuan & are exact matches.
17.66	--	FD1172	FD1172 is an exact match.
17.74	FD1176	--	FD1176 is not a close match.
17.75	FD1176	FD1176	FD1176 is an exact match.
17.76	FD1174, S699	FD1174, S899	Both are an exact match.
17.77	FD1174, S699	--	Neither is an exact match.
17.80	FD1179	--	FD1179 is not a close match.
Pg. 167			Variety of regular script Tongan mint coin with Tong mintmark left of hole omitted. Coin has medium O. rim, broad R. rim, 25mm dia. FD1192~
17.112	--	--	Coin is described as cresc. above, dot below, but depicted as dot above, cresc. below.
17.113	--	--	What is the character below the hole?
17.140	FD1194, S713	S713	FD1194 is 26mm. S713 & 17.140 are 28.5-29 mm
17.168	--	FD1203	FD1203 is an exact match.
17.169	S727	FD1202, S727	FD1202 is also an exact match.
17.185	S714	S714~	S714 has broad rims. 17.185 has medium rims.
17.214	S726	--	17.214 is iron; S726 is a bronze Iron Mother coin.
17.289	FD1218, S756	FD121`8~, S756	FD1218 has “blocky” Yuan. 17.289 & S756 have more “angled” Yuan.
17.310	--	FD1221	FD1221 is also an exact match.
17.312	--	FD1220	FD1220 is also an exact match.
17.359	FD1235, S781	FD1235, S783	S781 is 2 cash, 28mm. 17.259 & FD1235 are 3 cash, 30-34mm.
17.393	--	S808	Description of 17.393 & 17.394 are reversed.
17.394	S808	--	Description of 17.393 & 17.394 are reversed.
17.371	--	FD1257	FD1257 is also an exact match.
Pg 183			Number 17.411 is used twice, 1^st where it should have been 17.406; 2^nd where it is correct. Best solution is to change 1^st 17.411 into 17.406A and leave present 17.406 & 2^nd 17.411 as is.
17.451	FD1218, S829	S829, Hua705a	FD1218 is a bronze Iron Mother coin. 17.451, S829 is iron, and an exact match.
Pg. 189 17.507			Typo. “15.507” should be “17.507”
17.537	FD1450, S875	--	FD1450 & S875 have Li Yi on rev., not Chuan Li.
17.538	--	FD1450, S875	FD1450 & S875 have Li Yi on rev., not Chuan Li.
17.561			Typo. Text should read “ba (8 – 1215).”
17.577			Typo. Text should read “ba (8 – 1215).”
17.596			Typo. Text should read “ba (8 – 1215).”
17.601	FD1408, S931	Hua730a, S931	FD1408 is Han Yr. 15. 17.601 & S931 are Han Yr. 13.
17.603	--	FD1408	FD1408 is an exact match.
17.624	S945	S945	Legend above hole on rev. is Li Zhou, not Li.
17.651	FD1431, S935	--	Both FD1431 & S935 are 2 cash size, but depict cresc. and 2 dots (3 cash), not 1 dot (2 cash)
17.657	FD1437	--	FD1437 has Shi on rev., not Xin.
17.658	--	FD1437	17.658& FD1437 are exact matches.
17.663	--	FD1444, S940	In spite of Ding’s designation as a value 3 coin, size is consistent with value 2.
17.664	FD1444, S940	--	See preceding comment.
17.720	FD1487, S981	FD1487, S982	S981 Duan is tall, 17.720, FD1487 & S982 is short.
17.809	FD1550	--	FD1550 is medium size with large characters; not small coin with small characters.
17.857	FD1599, S1063	FD1598, S1063	Typo, FD1599 is an iron coin with unreadable rev.
SECTION 18
18.11	FD1619, S1065	FD1619~, S1065~	18.11 has angular legs; FD1619 & S1065 have curving legs.
18.17	FD1626	FD1626, S1070	18.17, FD1626 & S1070 all have short Bao.
18.18	FD1627, S1070	FD1627	18.18 & FD1627 have tall Bao; S1070 has short Bao.
Pg. 218	2^nd paragraph		Last sentence: ... further of Coin Directorate …
18.69	FD1664	FD1664~	At 20mm, FD1664 falls into the “Other sizes known” category.
SECTION 19
19.3	FD1819	--	FD1819 is the same as 14.136 in the Tang dynasty.
19.6	FD1064	FD1064~	FD1064 is not an exact match.
19.7	FD1057	FD1057~	FD1057 is not an exact match.
19.17	FD1792	FD1702	Typo
19.24	FD1711	FD1710	FD1710 is a better match.
19.25	FD1712	FD1711	FD1711 is a better match.
19.26	--	FD1712	19.26 & FD1712 are an exact match.
19.30	FD1717, S1097	FD1717~, S1097	19.39 & S1097 have small characters. FD1717 has bold characters.
19.46	FD1733, S1099	FD1733, ~S1099	19.46 & FD1733 are exact matches. S1099 is a close match.
19.59	FD1750	FD1750~	FD1750 is not an exact match.
19.60	FD1751	FD1753	FD1753 is an exact match, FD1751 is not.
19.61	FD1751	FD1751	FD1751 is an exact match.
19.64	--	--
19.65	--	FD1757	FD1757 is an exact match.
19.66	FD1760	FD1760~	FD1760 is a near match.
19.67	FD1761	FD1761~	FD1761 is a near match.
19.68	FD1763	FD1763~	FD1763 is a near match.
19.69	--	--	Obv. Legend is Zhi Shun Tong Bao, not Zhi Shun Yuan Bao
19.70	FD1766		Obv. Legend is Zhi Shun Tong Bao, not Zhi Shun Yuan Bao
19.71	FD1767		Obv. Legend is Zhi Shun Tong Bao, not Zhi Shun Yuan Bao
19.72	FD1767	FD1768	Typo; FD1767 already used as a match for 19.71
19.74	FD1762	FD1762~	FD1762 is a near match.
19.76	FD1780	FD1780~	FD1780 is 15mm; 19.76 is 13mm. FD1780 is not an exact match.
19.79	FD1776	FD1776~	FD1776 is 19.5mm; 19.79 is 18mm. FD1776 is not an exact match
19.81	FD1775	FD1775	Text should read “Rev: Dot right, crescent left.”; not the reverse as stated. Both references have dot right, crescent left.
19.141	FD1828, S1118	FD1828~, S1118~	19.141 has broad rims; FD1828 & S1118 have narrow rims.
SECTION 20
20.2	--	--	As shown, Bei appears to be 7 stroke, not 6 stroke.
20.41	FD1879	FD1879~	FD1879 has fine characters; 20.41 has bold characters.
20.43	FD1878	FD1878~	FD1878 has broad rims; 20.43 has narrow rims.
20.45	FD1884	FD1884~	Shi doesn’t touch inner rim on FD1884. Shi touches inner rim on 20.45.
20.60	FD1896, S1142	FD1896~, S1142~	FD1896 & S1142 have tall Yi Qian/small hole; 20.60 has short Yi Qian/large hole.
20.68	FD1903	FD1903~	FD1903 has bold characters & equal thickness Yi. 20.68 has fine characters & tapering Yi.
20.75	FD1909, S1154	FD1909~, S1154~	FD1909 & S1154 have small Er Qian; 20.75 has larger Er Qian.
20.79	FD1916	FD1916~	FD1916 has small character Fu; 10.79 has large character Fu.
20.80	FD1918	FD1918~	FD1918 has large Guang. 20.80 has small Guang.
20.87	FD1922, S1155	FD1922~, S1155	FD1922 has wide San Qian. 20.87, S1155 has narrow San Qian.
20.104	FD1944	FD1944~	FD1944 has tall Wu Guang. 20.104 has short Wu Guang.
20.125	FD1961	FD1961~	FD1961 has 3 strokes with dots. 20.125 has 3 strokes with dashes.
20.128	FD1962, S1181	FD1962	20.128 & FD1962 have regular type. S1181 has angular type.
20.129	--	S1181	20.129 & S1181 have angular type.
20.157	FD1970, S1189	FD1976, S1189	Typo.
20.158	FD1977	FD1977~	FD1977 has large size Tian. 20.158 has medium size Tian.
20.178	FD1987	FD1987~	FD1987 is medal alignment. 10.17 is coin alignment.
20.226	FD2017, S1221	FD2017, S1221~	S1221 has thin Shi; FD2017 has thick Shi.
20.236	FD2048, S1251	--	FD2048 & S1251 are 23mm, 2 dot Tong. 20.236 is >26mm, 1 dot Tong.
20.245	FD2086	FD2086~	FD2086 has wider bar of Er toward outer rim. 20.245 has wider bar toward inner rim. Large disparity between Hartill & Hua prices. Hartill: $50; Hua: 8500 yuan or ~$1020 ??
20.280	S1269	S1269~	S1269 has no rev. dot. 20.280 does.
20.287	S1264	FD2051, S1264	20.287, FD2051 & S1264 have Lu below hole with no dot. (See next entry also.)
20.288	FD2051, S1265	S1265	20.288 & S1265 have dot above, and Lu below. FD2051 has no dot.
20.297	FD2052, S1258		20.297 is listed as Type 1.2, but my Jiang mintmark coin is definitely Type 1.1?
20.302	--	S1227	20.302 & S1227 are match with plain reverse.
20.303	S1227	--	S1227 has plain rev. 20.303 has a crescent above hole.
20.316	--	FD2068	20.316& FD2068 are exact matches. Rarity not assigned
Pg. 262			2^nd para., last sentence: “and other” should be “another”
20.334	S1274	FD2069, S1274	Reverses are exact matches.

20.354	FD2079, S1278-79	--	20.354 horse is above hole. FD2078 & S1277-78 horse is below hole.
20.355	--	FD2079, S1278	20.354, FD2078 & S1278 horse is below hole.
SECTION 21
21.10	FD2140, S1329	FD2140~, S1329~	FD2140 is only 22mm, S1329 has a plain rev. 21.10 is 26mm.
21.11	FD2141, S1331	S1331~	FD2141 is 27-28.5mm. S1331 is 31.3mm. 21.11 is 35mm.
21.30	--	FD2100	FD2100 is an exact match.
21.45	S1297	S1297~, FD2113	21.45 has a 1-dot Tong & plain rev. S1297 has a dot below the hole. FD2113 is an exact match. (I don’t believe the off-center blob on the rev. above the hole is a dot, and neither Ding Fubao nor Hua Guangpu indicate xing (star) for the coin rev.)
21.46	--	S1296~	Close match.
21.57	FD2113	--	See comments for 21.45. 21.57 has a 2-dot, square head Tong. FD2113 has a (difficult to read) square or closed head 1 dot Tong.
21.80	FD2128, S1316-17	S1316-17	FD2128 has a very broad rev. inner rim. 21.80 has a narrow convex inner rim on the rev.
21.85	FD2147, S1335	FD2147~, S1335	FD2147 is 26mm, others are 24mm, exact match.
21.89	FD2148, S1338	FD2148, S1339	S1338 is 22.5mm. Others are 26-27mm.
21.97	FD2151	--	FD2151 is 25mm. 21.97 is 30-31mm.
21.99	FD2150	FD2156	Typo. FD2150 is 27mm Er Li. 21.99 & FD2156 are 41mm Yi Fen.
SECTION 22
22.85	FD2250, S1419		FD2250 is 26.4mm; S1419 is 25.5mm. Both have narrow outer rims. 22.85 is 28-29mm with broad rims.
22.98	FD2253, S1424	S1424	FD2253 has a small Fu. 22.98 & S1424 have a large Fu.
22.108	S1444	S1444~	Schjöth states that S1443, S1444, & S1445 are all Lohan Xi obverses. 22.108 is not.
22.110	S1432	FD2261, S1432	All are an exact match.
22.112	FD2261	--	FD2261 is not in printed style. 22.112 is.
22.117	--	S1446	22.117 & S1446 are an exact match.
22.119			I’m confused. Fisher/Ding and Jen refer to this as Gansu province, Ning Xia mint, while Hartill refers to it as Jiangning (mint?) (Nanking).
22.123	FD2225, S1426	FD2255, S1426	Typo.
22.126	FD2258, S1429	--	Artwork for rev. of 22.126 doesn’t match either FD2258 or S1429. -n of Yuan extends beyond the left edge of the inner rim on both FD2258 & S1429, while on 22.126 it stops at the edge of the rim.
22.127	--	FD2258, S1429	Artwork for rev. of 22.127, FD2258 & S1429 are matches, -n of Yuwan extends beyond the left edge of the inner rim & -n of Yuan extends below the inner rim. (FD2250-2273 aren’t all 1-dot Tong obverses; e.g. 22.124/FD2264.)
22.130	FD2267, S1438	FD2267~, ,S1438~	22.130 is 25mm; FD2267 is 27mm; S1438 is 24mm
22.131	FD2270, S1441	FD2270, S1441~	S1441 has a wide X in the yǔ component of Yun.
22.150	FD2277, S1453	FD2277~, S1453~	22.150 doesn’t resemble FD2277; broader rims and different chiowan. S1453 has yet another chiowan.
22.155	FD2278, S1454	FD2278~, S1454	22.155 has a 2-dot Tong, 7-stroke closed bei & small characters. FD2278 has large characters & narrower rims.
22.163	S1460	--	22.163 is 27.5mm with broad rims; S1460 is 23.5mm with narrow rims.
22.166	FD2280	FD2280~	22.166 has broad rims; FD2280 has medium rims.
22.170	FD2285, S1457	FD2285~, S1457	FD2285 has narrower rims. 22.170 & S1457 have broad rims.
22,171	FD2283	FD2283~	FD2283 has narrower rims. 22.171 has broad rims.
22.174	FD2292	FD2292~	FD2292 has narrower rims & diff. Jin. 22.174 has broad rims & bold Jin.
Pg 294		FD2288	Shaanxi province-Xi'an mint omitted.
Pg 294		FD2289	Taiwan province-Taiwanfu mint omitted.
22.176	FD2294	FD2294~	FD2294 has narrower rims. 22.176 has broad rims.
Pg 295	(1723-135)	(1723-35)	Typo.
22.178	FD2284, S1456	--	22.178 has a vertical head on yūn, 28.5mm. FD2284 is 26mm, angled head on yūn. S1456 is 26mm with a small, different style yūn.
22.185			Cf 5.65 does not exist (typo?).
22.188	FD2279, S1455	FD2279~, S1455	FD2279 is 26mm with a curving je. 22.188 is 28mm with a vertical, straight je.
22.202	FD2297, S1464	S1464	FD2297 is 22mm; 22.202 & S1464 are 25mm.
22.251	FD2306, S1466	--	22.251 is 27mm/broad rims. FD2306 & S1466 are 21mm/narrow rims.
2.271	FD2314, S1469	FD2314~, S1469~	FD2314 & S1469 are 23-24mm with narrow rims. 22.271 is 25mm with broad rims.
22.276	FD2320, S1477	FD2320~, S1477~	FD2320 has a smaller Guang. S1477 has smaller dia.
22.288			Rev. is not plain, has boo wu.
22.291			Rev. is not plain, has boo wu.
22.293			Rev. is not plain, has boo wu.
22.295			Coin rarity omitted.
Pg. 306			Text below 22.314: . . . “In 1778” . . . should be “In 1788”, as dates indicate no coins minted between 1765-1788.
22.317	FD2318, S1475	--	Neither coin closely resembles 22.317
22.325	FD2324, S1485	--	22.325 has med. rims; FD2324 & S1485 have narrow.
22.331	FD2313, S1468	--	22.331 has med. rims; FD2313 & S1468 have narrow.
22.332	--	S1468	All are exact match with narrow rev. characters.
22.333	--	FD2313	Rev. of FD2313 is an exact match with 22.333
2.334	FD2323, S1484	FD2323~, S1484~	22.334 is 27.5mm with broad rims. FD2323 & S1484 are 25mm with narrower rims.
22.337	FD2321, S1480	FD2321	S1480 is a poor match.
22.346	--	S1480	S1480 and 22.346 are an exact match.
22.349	FD2315, S1470	S1470	FD2315 has small characters.
22.350	--	FD2315	22.350 & FD2315 are an exact match.
22.357	FD2312, S1467	--	FD2312 & S1467 are not a close match.
22.362	--	S1467	22.362 & S1467 are an exact match.
Pg. 311			Top and bottom of text: ‘Guangxi period’ should be ‘Guangxu period’
Pg. 312			Top of text: ‘Guangxi period’ should be ‘Guangxu period’
22.395	FD2327	--	FD2327 doesn’t have top of I slanting.
Pg. 314			Top of text: ‘Guangxi period’ should be ‘Guangxu period’
Pg. 315			Top of text: ‘Guangxi period’ should be ‘Guangxu period’
22.481	FD2339, S1490	--	FD2339 & S1490 are 22-24mm; more like 22.486-22.488 than the 27mm 22.481.
22.501	FD2347, S1500	--	FD2347 & S1500 more closely resemble 22.503
22.505	FD2341, S1493	FD2341~, S1493	FD2341 has upward-curved top on Guang. S1493 & 22.505 have downward-curved top on Guang.
22.527	FD2352, S1507	FD2352, S1507~	S1507 has tall Chang. 22.527 & FD2352 Chang is short.
22.528	--	S1508	Image of S1508 is in error. Schjöth’s text for S1508 states: “with a star above the hole.”
22.560	FD2358	--	FD2358 has a 1-dot Tong. 22.560 has a 2-dot Tong.
22.591			Privy mark missing from illustrations.
22.593-5	FD2387, S1513	FD2387~, S1513~	Both FD2387 & S1513 have a dot above the hole on the rev. 22.593-5 have no dot.
22.599	FD2403, S1533	--	Reverses of FD2403 & S1533 more nearly resemble 22.600 local variation.
22.600	--	FD2403, S1533~	Same comment.
22.617	FD2302, S1519	FD2392, S1519	Typo.
22.628	FD2393, S1520	--	Reverses of FD2393 & S1520 more closely resemble 22.629
22.629	--	FD2393, S1520	Same comment.
22.639	S1525	S1525	Radical of Dao has a bent, not straight line. Should be grouped with 22.637-8. Description of 22.638/22.639 could be: :D- of large dung/small dung written . . .”
22.658	FD2404	--	FD2404 has no line above, 26mm. 22.658 has line above, 24mm.
22.675	FD2411, S1534	--	FD2411 is Type B North branch. S1534 is Type B South branch. 22.675 is Type A East branch.
Pg. 338			Hua1334 depicts an East branch value 1000 brass coin with 6-stroke bei. Coin has same rarity as West coin.
Pg. 339			Text below coin images should read: “Rev: Dot and crescent top right and left.” to agree with image.
22.725			Text: “Closed head, one dot tong” Image: Closed head two dot tong. ? branch.
22.726			Text: “No privy marks.” Image: Closed head one dot tong. Should be West branch. (Are text for 22.725 and 22.726 reversed?
22.770	FD2508, S1549	S1549~	FD2508 is not a good match for 22.770. (It is an exact match for the iron 22.774. I wonder if Ding Fubao made a mistake?)
22.782	FD2523	FD2523~, Hua1581a	FD2523, Hua1580a (and Craig C10-14) have a short bar on Fu. 22.782 & Hua1581a have a longer bar on Fu.
22.784	FD2526	FD2526~, Hua1584a	FD2526 & Hua1583a have a tall triangle connected to the top horizontal stroke of Xian. 22.784 & Hua1584a have a shorter triangle not touching the horizontal bar of Xian.
22.791	--	FD2516	FD2516 is an exact match.
22.802	--	--	The rarity given for 22.802 is class 10 ($500). H1517e is the identical image, with a value of 70Yuan (~$8.40). H1517f to the immediate right, is valued at 300Yuan. Could the price be wrong for 22.802?
22.803	FD2537	FD2537~	FD2537 is 29+mm. 22.803 is 26-27mm.
22.807	FD2538	FD2538~	FD2538 is 41mm with narrow rims. 22.807 is 46-50mm with broad rims.
22.817	FD2561	FD2561~	FD2561 has medium rims. 22.817 has narrow rims.
22.850	--	FD2494~	Close match. Head of He slightly different.
22.851	FD2494	FD2495	FD2494 is 500 cash. 22.851 & FD2495 are 1000 cash.
22.856	FD2472	FD2472~	22.856 has medium rims. FD2472 has wider rims & bolder characters.
22.861	FD2474	FD2474~	FD2474 has small characters. 22.861 has large characters.
22.865	--	FD2474	22.865 & FD2474 are exact matches.
22.869	--	FD2471	22.869 & FD2471 are exact matches.
22.876	FD2462, S1536	FD2462~, S1536~	FD2462 & S1536 are ~21mm, 22.876 is 24-25mm.
22.896	FD2468	FS2468~	22.896 is 61.5mm, rim 8.5mm wide. FD2468 is 53mm, rim is 5mm wide.
22.898	--	--	Rarity value missing.
22.913-14	--	--	22.913 & 22.914 appear to be 7-stroke bei.
22.925	FD2504, S1537	FD2504~, S1537~	22.925 is 24.5-25mm. Others are 22mm.
22.980	FD2531	FD2551	Typo.
22.981	FD2532	FD2552	Typo.
22.1006	--	--	Hua1628h is similar, but shows concentric circles below. Could these be the same coin? If so, which is correct?
22.1019	FD2559	FD2559~	FD2559 has a small Yun, 22.1019 has a large Yun.
22.1020	FD2553, S1547	FD2553~, S1547	FD2553 has medium rims. 22.1020 & S1547 have broad rims.
22.1025	FD2475, S1538	FD2475~, S1538~	FD2475 & S1538 are 20-21mm with narrow rims. 22.1025 is 23.8-24.5mm with broad rims.
22.1059	FD2531	--	Brass coins: FD2531, J778 & C6-2. Iron Coins: 22.1059 & C6-2a.
22.1074	FD2570	FD2570, Hua1657a	Variety is better characterized by “small Boo” rather than “tail of Aksu curly”.
22.1075	--		Variety is better characterized by “large Boo” rather than “tail of Aksu curves right”.
Variety of 22.1076		FD2569, Hua1657b	Rather common variety omitted (3 of my 15 Value 10 Aksu coins.) Obverse has protruding head bei; reverse has small Boo and curly tail Aksu like 22.1074 instead of sharply bent tail like 22.1076.
Variety of 22.1076		--	Rather common variety omitted (3 of my 15 Value 10 Aksu coins.) Obverse has protruding head bei; reverse has small Boo with near vertical tail, and curly tail Aksu like 22.1074 instead of sharply bent tail like 22.1076.
Pg. 395			1 cash coin from Board of Works missing.
22.1129	FD2595, S1600	S1600~	FD2595 appears to be Fou Bao, 29mm 7-stroke bei. S1600 is 31mm, 7-stroke bei. 22.1129 is Fou Bao, 30mm, 6-stroke bei.
22.1131	--	FD2595~	See comments above.
22.1133	FD2598	--	FD2598 appears to be 7-stroke bei. 22.1133 is 6-stroke.
22.1134	--	FD2598	See comment above.
22.1146a	FD2590, S1556	S1556	FD2590 appears to be 7-stroke bei.
22.1146b	FD2590, S1556	--	FD2590 appears to be 7-stroke bei. S1556 is smaller.
22.1147	--	FD2590	FD2590 is an exact match.
22.1171	S1588	S1558~?	Typo. S1588 is a struck coin. S1558 is not a close match: 21mm vs. 25mm for 22.1171.
22.1187			“. . .shi above.” Should be”. . .shi yi above”
22.1192			Yi is depicted as below hole; text states above hole.
22.1203	--	FD2614	FD2614 is an exact match.
22.1267-22.1272	Pg 404		Numbers are duplicated for Emperor Mu Zong and Rashidin Khan. I suggest a capital A after the Hartill number for the Rashidin Khan coins.
22.1288?			Jia above hole (Craig C1-16.1) omitted from 1000 Character Classical series
22.1289?			Dot below hole (Craig C1-16.8) omitted from 1000 Character Classical series
22.1290	FD2640	FD2641	FD2640 is Er Bao, 7-stroke (South branch). 22.1290 & FD2641 are Fou Bao, 6-stroke (East branch).
22.1291	S1603	FD2640, S1603	FD2640, S1603 & 22.1291 are Er Bao, 7-stroke (South branch).
Pg. 406			It seems that there should be a “Type B3” for the 22mm coins like C1-18.1 and Hua1771b, based on the great differences in diameter vs B2 (22 vs 26-28mm).
22.131x			Ri above, dot below hole (Craig C2-15.7) omitted from 1000 Character Classical series
22.131y			Jin above hole (Jen J856) omitted from 1000 Character Classical series
22.1316	FD2637	--	FD2637 is 7-stroke bei. 22.1316 is 6-stroke bei.
22.1317	--	FD2637	FD2637 & 22.1317 are 7-stroke bei.
Pg. 409			Guiyang mint in Guangzhou province should be in Guizhou province. (22.1339-41)
22.1334	S1588	S1588, FD2631	FD2631 is also an exact match.
22.1336	--	FD2623	FD2623 is an exact match.
22.1379	FD2630	FD2620	Typo.
22.1429	FD2615, S1572	S1572	FD2615 appears to be Er bao
22.1460-22.1463			2 additional varieties omitted: 1). 22.1461 variety with weight 2.64gm, 23.6mm 2). Similar coin with elevated jiyen as 22.1463 (2.3gm, 23.3mm)
SECTION 23
23.5	--	FD2680	Exact match.
23.6	--	FD2669	Exact match.
23.7			Hartill; 5 cash. Hua & Jen; 10 cash. Which is correct? Based on comparative diameters of 23.7, 23.12 & 23.16; 10 should be correct.
23.8			Hartill; 10 cash. Hua & Jen; 50 cash. Which is correct? Based on comparative diameters of 23.8, 23.13 & 23.17; 50 cash should be correct.
23.9			Hartill; 50 cash. Hua & Jen; 100 cash. Which is correct? 100 cash should follow from above.
23.10	FD2669, S1605	S1605	See comment for 23.6
23.14	--	FD2684, S1606	Exact matches.
23.15	--	FD2671	Exact matches.
23.17	--	FD2677	Exact matches.
23.19	S1606	--	S1606 obv. reads TBRL. 23.19 reads RLTB.
23.48			Qian ying is front camp, not rear camp.
23.49			Hou ying is rear camp, not front camp.
SECTION 24
24.3			Rarity value is indented on left side of page instead of being to the far right.
SECTION 25
No entries
SECTION 26
No entries

Notes:

A lower-case letter after HuaXXXX refers to the image position on a page of Hua Guangpu’s Zhongguo Guqian Mulu, starting with “a” in the upper left hand of the page, and lettered in sequence across and down the page.
“H” references are to images in Hua Guangpu’s Zhongguo Guqian Daji, published in August, 2004; which are not in the 1998 version, Zhongguo Guqian Mulu.